4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Spectroelectrochernical study of a soluble derivative of poly(aniline) in a room temperature ionic liquid

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 53, 期 3, 页码 1217-1224

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.12.055

关键词

poly(aniline); poly(phenylene sulfide); ionic liquid; spectroelectrochemistry; Raman spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(phenylene sulfide phenyleneamine), PPSA, is a soluble copolymer of poly(aniline) and poly(phenylene sulfide). Its electrochemical behavior has already been studied in both aqueous and organic media in the presence of different electrolytes, where it was observed the loss of electroactivity after few cycles. In this paper, the spectroelectrochernical characterization of PPSA films in a room temperature ionic liquid (RTIL), 1-butyl-2,3dimethylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanes sulfonyl)imide (BMMITFSI), is shown. The electrochemical response of a PPSA modified electrode in BMMITFSI is different from that obtained in organic solvent/salt systems. In RTIL, two reversible redox processes were observed and they were assigned to the reversible radical cation/dication transition based on in situ UV-vis and Raman spectroscopic studies. The stabilization of the dicationic species in RTIL is an explanation for the reversible electrochemical response of the PPSA in BMMITFSI; on the contrary, when the electrochemical oxidation is carried out in conventional organic electrolytes, once the oxidation of the sulfur atom occurs, a loss of electroactivity is observed being not possible to recover the pristine state of the polymer. FTIR and XRD data obtained for the fully oxidized polymer in acetonitrile are consistent with the formation of a networked polymer due to the electrophilic attack of the positive sulfur atom on the activated aromatic rings. It is not the case in RTIL due to the shielding of the charged sulfur atoms avoiding its reaction to other chains to form the networked polymeric matrix. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据