4.7 Article

The distances to open clusters from main-sequence fitting. IV. Galactic Cepheids, the LMC, and the local distance scale

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 671, 期 2, 页码 1640-1668

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/522304

关键词

Cepheids; distance scale; galaxies : individual (M33, NGC 4258); Magellanic Clouds; open clusters and associations : general; stars : distances

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We derive the basic properties of seven Galactic open clusters containing Cepheids and construct their period-luminosity (P-L) relations. For our cluster main-sequence fitting we extend previous Hyades-based empirical color-temperature corrections to hotter stars using the Pleiades as a template. We use BVI(C)JHK(s) data to test the reddening law and include metallicity effects to perform a more comprehensive study for our clusters than prior efforts. The ratio of total to selective extinction RV that we derive is consistent with expectations. Assuming the LMC P-L slopes, we find < M-V > = -3.93 +/- 0.07 (statistical) +/- 0.14 (systematic) for 10 day period Cepheids, which is generally fainter than those in previous studies. Our results are consistent with recent HST and Hipparcos parallax studies when using the Wesenheit magnitudes W(VI). Uncertainties in reddening and metallicity are the major remaining sources of error in the V-band P-L relation, but a higher precision could be obtained with deeper optical and near-infrared cluster photometry. We derive distances to NGC 4258, the LMC, and M33 of (m - M)(0) = 29.28 +/- 0.10, 18: 34 +/- 0.06, and 24.55 +/- 0.28, respectively, with an additional systematic error of 0.16 mag in the P-L relations. The distance to NGC 4258 is in good agreement with the geometric distance derived from water masers [Delta(m - M)(0) 0.01 +/- 0.24], our value for M33 is less consistent with the distance from an eclipsing binary [Delta(m - M)(0) = 0.37 +/- 0.34], and our LMC distance is moderately shorter than the adopted distance in the HST Key Project, which formally implies an increase in the Hubble constant of 7% +/- 8%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据