4.5 Article

Expression of Prox1, Lymphatic Endothelial Nuclear Transcription Factor, in Kaposiform Hemangioendothelioma and Tufted Angioma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 1563-1573

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181f6076f

关键词

Prox1; LYVE-1; podoplanin (D2-40); CD31; CD34; infantile hemangioma; kaposiform hemangioendothelioma; tufted angioma

资金

  1. Departments of Pathology and Dermatology from Stanford University Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE) and tufted angioma (TA) are rare tumors mainly occurring in early childhood. Our recent results showed that ectopic overexpression of human Prox1 gene, a lymphatic endothelial nuclear transcription factor, promoted an aggressive behavior in 2 murine models of KHE. This dramatic Prox1-induced phenotype prompted us to investigate immunohistochemical staining pattern of Prox1, podoplanin (D2-40), LYVE-1, and Prox1/CD34 as well as double immunofluorescent staining pattern of LYVE-1/CD31 in KHE and TA, compared with other pediatric vascular tumors. For this purpose, we examined 75 vascular lesions: KHE (n = 18), TA (n = 13), infantile hemangioma (n = 13), pyogenic granuloma (n = 18), and granulation tissue (n = 13). Overall, KHE and TA shared an identical endothelial immunophenotype: the neoplastic spindle cells were Prox1(+), podoplanin(+), LYVE-1(+), CD31(+), and CD34(+), whereas endothelial cells within glomeruloid foci were Prox1(-), podoplanin(-), LYVE-1(-), CD31(+), and CD34(+). The lesional cells of all infantile hemangiomas and pyogenic granulomas were negative for Prox1 in the presence of positive internal control. These findings provide immunophenotypic evidence to support a preexisting notion that KHE and TA are closely related, if not identical. Overall, our results show, for the first time, that Prox1 is an immunohistochemical biomarker helpful in confirming the diagnosis of KHE/TA and in distinguishing it from infantile hemangioma and pyogenic granuloma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据