4.6 Article

Role of moist energy advection in formulating anomalous Walker Circulation associated with El Nino

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008744

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Meteorological Administration [CATER2006-4206] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [과06A1402] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of meridional moist energy advection in formulating anomalous Walker Circulation during El Nino events is investigated using observational data and linearized GCM. During the El Nino mature phase, the warm pool is extended to the central Pacific, so that the magnitudes of equatorial SST become uniform over the western-central Pacific. In contrast to the uniform SST distribution over the western-central Pacific, the maximum of equatorial convective activities are zonally displaced from the western to the central Pacific. That is in line with the fact that the strong anomalous descending motions are located over the western Pacific without local negative SST anomalies. It is demonstrated here that suppressed convection over the western Pacific is associated with cold-dry moist energy advection due to low-level equatorward winds. The meridional cold-dry moist energy advection leads the vertical warm-wet moist energy advection and adiabatic warming processes (descending motion) to balance the moist energy budget. It is shown that this meridional wind is a part of a cyclonic Rossby wave in response to the anomalous convection induced by El Nino SST. This mechanism, suggested here, is validated by using a linearized GCM. The model results show the downward branch of the anomalous Walker Circulation over the western Pacific is significantly reduced when the moist energy advection is not allowed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据