4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Interinstitutional variation in the measurement of anti-A/B antibodies: The Japanese ABO-Incompatible Transplantation Committee survey

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 84, 期 12, 页码 S13-S16

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000296018.82857.ef

关键词

transplantation; kidney; ABO-incompatible; anti-A/B antibodies; interinstitutional variation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exact measurement of antiblood groups A and B antibody (Ab) titers is critical for successful ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation (ABO-ILKT). However, no standard method for quantitative determination has yet been established. In most institutions performing ABO-ILKT, serial-doubling dilution of serum using a tube technique (TT) is a standard method for determining anti-ABO Ab titers, but there are very large interinstitutional variations in the titration of anti-ABO Abs using the TT. The Japanese ABO-Incompatible Transplantation Committee has conducted a national survey to measure anti-ABO Ab titers among more than 30 Japanese institutions. Interinstitutional differences between maximum and minimum values were as large as 32-fold in immunoglobulin M (IgM) and 256-fold in immunoglobulin G (IgG). There seem to be many detailed technical differences in the TT among the institutions. Consequently, in the present study we tried to find the most reliable technique for measuring anti-ABO Ab titers. We compared four different techniques, the TT, BioVue Column Agglutination Technology, DiaMed-ID Micro Typing System, and flow cytometry (FCM). Theoretically, FCM seems to be the most reliable technique because it does not require a great number of agents, each of which may affect the results. The FCM technique yielded a very consistent outcome in repeated measurements and it is one of the most objective techniques because measured data are automatically analyzed by a computer system. In our experience, FCM shows very good reproducibility and seems to be the best technique for titration since it can be performed without use of agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据