4.6 Article

Induction of the SUMO-specific protease 1 transcription by the androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 282, 期 52, 页码 37341-37349

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M706978200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [F32 CA110620] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostate cancer, the most frequently diagnosed carcinoma in males, is readily modulated via the transcriptional activity of androgen receptors. Our recent publication reported that androgen receptor-dependent transcription is significantly elevated with expression of the human sentrin/SUMO-specific protease (SENP1) in the androgen-sensitive human prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP). In situ hybridization studies indicated an elevation of SENP1 message in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer lesions as compared with normal prostate epithelia. This study aimed to delineate the mechanism for the regulation of SENP1 message and to determine the pathophysiological consequence of SENP1 induction with respect to prostate cancer. Real-time PCR confirmed the elevation of SENP1 mRNA in prostate cancer cells as compared with normal prostate epithelial cells. Chronic androgen exposure of LNCaP cells prompted an enhancement in the SENP1 transcript selectively. This androgen-mediated augmentation of SENP1 was absent with co-administration of the androgen receptor antagonist bicalutamide and in androgen receptor-negative prostate cancer PC-3 cells, indicating an androgen receptor-dependent event. Activation of the androgen receptor was required for binding an identified androgen response element and positively regulating SENP1 promoter activity. Abrogation of elevated SENP1 mRNA in prostate cancer cells significantly decreased androgen-mediated cell growth. Because increased SENP1 expression directly modulated androgen receptor-dependent cell proliferation and transcription, SENP1 could play an important role in prostate carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据