4.6 Article

Pivotal role of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1 in apoptosis and autophagy

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 283, 期 1, 页码 388-397

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M611043200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 16672] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Programmed cell death (PCD) is involved in a variety of biologic events. Based on the morphologic appearance of the cells, there are two types of PCD as follows: apoptotic(type I) and autophagic(type II). However, the molecular machinery that determines the type of PCD is poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to show whether the presence of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p21(WAF1/CIP1), a modulator of apoptosis, determines which type of PCD the cell undergoes. Treatment with C-2-ceramide was associated with both the cleavage of caspase-3 and poly(ADP- ribose) polymerase and the degradation of autophagy-related Beclin 1 and Atg5 proteins, without a change in the cyclin-CDK activity, which culminated in apoptosis in p21(+/+) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). On the other hand, C-2-ceramide did not cleave caspase-3 or poly(ADP- ribose) polymerase and kept Beclin 1 and Atg5 proteins stable in p21(+/+) MEFs, events that this time culminated in autophagy. When expression of the p21 protein was inhibited by small interfering RNA or when the overexpression of Beclin 1 or Atg5 was induced, autophagy rather than apoptosis was initiated in the p21(+/+) MEFs treated with C-2-ceramide. In contrast, the exogenous expression of p21 or the silencing of Beclin 1 and Atg5 with small interfering RNA increased the number of apoptotic cells and decreased the number of autophagic cells among C-2-ceramide-treated p21(+/+) MEFs. gamma-Irradiation, which endogenously generates ceramide, induced a similar tendency in these MEFs. These results suggest that p21 plays an essential role in determining the type of cell death, positively for apoptosis and negatively for autophagy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据