4.7 Article

Study on the high-temperature electrochemical performance of perovskite-type oxide LaFeO3 with carbon modification

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 40, 期 28, 页码 8742-8749

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.047

关键词

Perovskite-type oxide LaFeO3; Carbon modification; High-temperature electrochemical performance; MH-Ni battery

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51171165, 21303157]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2012203027, B2012203104, B2014203114]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project [2013M541201]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20131333120008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To further improve the high-temperature electrochemical performance of perovskite-type oxides, the LaFeO3 carbon-coated composites used as the negative materials for MH-Ni batteries were obtained using the polyaniline (PANI) pyrolysis method. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results revealed that LaFeO3 particles were evenly coated with carbon layers, forming a core-shell structure. The carbon layers could enhance the conductivity and electrocatalytic activity, speeding up hydrogen protons transferring from electrolyte to electrode interface. Furthermore, the carbon coatings hindered the LaFeO3 particles from aggregating into stacks and reduced the corrosion of the LaFeO3 electrodes. At an elevated temperature (60 degrees C), owing to the carbon coatings, the maximum discharge capacity of the LaFeO3 electrodes remarkably increased from 211 mAh g(-1) to 358 mAh g(-1), and charge retention (CR) increased from 85.4% to 94.6%. Also, the high rate dischargeability at a discharge current density of 1500 mA g(-1) (HRD1500) increased from 21.0% to 37.6%, and the capacity retention rate after 100 cycles (S-100) increased from 63.0% to 70.9%. Copyright (C) 2015, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据