4.4 Article

Obesity, outcomes and quality of care: body mass index increases the risk of wound-related complications in colon cancer surgery

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 207, 期 1, 页码 17-23

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.05.016

关键词

Colon cancer; Obesity; Body mass index; Postoperative complications; Perioperative outcomes

类别

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [8UL1TR000170-05]
  2. Harvard University
  3. Dutch Cancer Society
  4. Dutch Digestive Society
  5. Amsterdam University Funds
  6. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  7. Fulbright Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Obese patients may face higher complication rates during surgical treatment of colon cancer. The aim of this study was to measure this effect at a high-volume tertiary care center. METHODS: All patients with colon cancer treated surgically at a single center from 2004 through 2011 were reviewed. Multivariate regression assessed relationships of complications and stay outcomes with body mass index (BMI) controlling for age, gender, comorbidity score, surgical approach, and history of smoking. RESULTS: In 1,048 included patients, BMI was a predictor of several complications in both laparoscopic and open procedures. For every increase of BMI by one World Health Organization category, the odds ratios were 1.61 (P < .001) for wound infection and 1.54 (P < .001) for slow healing. Additionally, right colectomies had an odds ratio of 3.23 (P = .017) for wound dehiscence. No further associations with BMI were found. CONCLUSIONS: BMI was incrementally associated with wound-related complications, illustrating how the proliferation of obesity relates to a growing risk for surgical complications. As the surgical community strives to improve the quality of care, patient-controllable factors will play an increasingly important role in cost containment and quality improvement. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据