4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of compression ratio on performance and emissions of a modified diesel engine fueled by HCNG

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 40, 期 44, 页码 15374-15380

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.058

关键词

Compression ratio; Modified diesel engine; HCNG blends; Engine performance; Engine emissions

资金

  1. Unit of the Scientific Research Projects of Erciyes University [FBD-11-3493, FBY-11-3496]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effects of compression ratio (CR) have been investigated engine performance and emissions characteristics of a modified diesel engine fueled by HCNG (hydrogen enriched compression natural gas) blends (100% CNG, 95% CNG +5% H-2, 90% CNG + 10% H-2 and 80% CNG + 20% H-2). The experiments have been carried out using a modified Isuzu 3.9 L diesel engine having 9.6, 12.5 and 15 different compression ratios at 1500 rpm under full load conditions. Engine brake torque, brake specific fuel consumption, combustion analysis and emissions parameters (CO, THC and NOX) have been realized at 10 CA BTDC ignition timing and different excess air ratios (lambda = 0.9-1.3). The experimental results showed that the highest brake torque and lowest BSFC values were obtained at CR of 12.5 for all blends. When the CR value was 9.6, torque values increased with addition of hydrogen to CNG and CNG lost the advantages at high excess air ratios and low compression ratio due to its low flame speed. In addition, the maximum cylinder pressure (PmAR) and the rate of heat release (ROHR) values closed to top dead center with increasing CR and addition of hydrogen to CNG. The THC emissions were generally lower than Euro VI standards. Max emissions increased with hydrogen addition to CNG. Finally, experiments showed that a compression ratio of 12.5 was a reasonable value for the modified engine. Copyright (C) 2015, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据