4.6 Article

Preparation of a nanosilica-modified negative-type acrylate photoresist

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 107, 期 2, 页码 1179-1188

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/app.27151

关键词

composites; photoresists; silicas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new type of negative photoresist, which incorporated nanosized silica into a photosensitive acrylic resin, was developed. First, free-radical polymerization was employed to synthesize the acrylic resin, poly[methyl methacrylate/methacrylic acid/3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate], and then a silica precursor, prepared by hydrolysis and condensation of tetra ethoxysilane in a solgel process, was introduced into the as-formed resin solution. After the addition of photosensitive monomers and photoinitiators, a negative-type organic-inorganic photoresist was produced. The morphology of the UV-cured photoresist, as observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy, indicated that the size of the silica domain in the material could be reduced from 300 to about 50 nm by appropriate dosage of 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate. Thermogravimetric analysis, dynamic mechanical analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermal mechanical analysis were used to evaluate the thermal and dimensional stabilities of the cured photoresists. It was found that the thermal decomposition temperature and glass-transition temperature increased, whereas the thermal expansion coefficients before and after the glass transition decreased, with increasing silica content. The incorporation of 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate also enhanced the thermal and dimensional stabilities; however, the level of enhancement was moderate for the thermal decomposition temperature and thermal expansion coefficient and low for the glass-transition temperature. In addition, a photoresist coated on a copper substrate demonstrated high hardness (5H) and strong adhesion (100%) with a resolution of 30 pm. (C) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据