4.7 Article

Gas conditioning in H2 rich syngas production by biomass steam gasification: Experimental comparison between three innovative ceramic filter candles

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 40, 期 23, 页码 7282-7290

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.169

关键词

Hydrogen production; Biomass steam gasification; Ceramic filter candles; Hot gas conditioning

资金

  1. European Union [299732]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The biomass steam gasification is a promising path to obtain hydrogen-rich syngas and to improve the global efficiency for cogeneration purposes. The present study reports the results of a campaign of steam gasification tests performed in a bench-scale gasifier (0.1 m ID) housing in its freeboard a ceramic filter, in a temperature range of 800 degrees C-815 degrees C. Three new ceramic filters have been tested: (i) noncatalytic candle with new support, (ii) filter candle with catalytic layer, (iii) filter candle with new integrated catalytic foam system and results were compared to those obtained in tests without candle. The volume composition of the syngas was monitored and analyzed by online measurement by means of infrared - thermal conductivity detector (IR-TCD) facilities to evaluate the CO, CO2, CH4, H-2, NH3 composition. The Topping Atmosphere Residue (tar) content was evaluated by gas-chromatograph mass spectrometer (GCMS) facility; gas yield, water conversion and char conversion were also calculated from direct measurements. The best results were obtained in the case of innovative catalytic filter in association with cycled olivine bed, obtaining gas yield equal to 1.80 Nm(3)/kg(daf) (vs 1.00 Nm(3)/kgdaf without candle); observed to theoretical water conversion ratio equal to 0.88 (vs 0.33); H-2 volume content equal to 56% (vs 39%); total tar content equal to 0.14 g/Nm(3) (vs 6 g/Nm(3)). Copyright (C) 2015, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据