期刊
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 230-235出版社
PSYCHONOMIC SOC INC
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.1.230
关键词
-
资金
- NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD021338-21, R01 HD-21338, R01 HD021338] Funding Source: Medline
A key question in cognitive psychology is whether information in short-term memory is lost as a function of time. Lewandowsky, Duncan, and Brown (2004) argued against that memory loss because forgetting in serial recall occurred to the same extent across serial positions regardless of the rate of recall. However, we believe Lewandowsky et al. (2004) only prevented one of two types of rehearsal; they did not prevent nonarticulatory rehearsal via attention. To prevent articulatory and nonarticulatory rehearsal without introducing interference, we presented unevenly timed stimuli for serial recall and, on some trials, required that the timing of stimuli be reproduced in the response. In those trials only, evidence of memory loss over time emerged. Further research is needed to identify whether this memory loss is decay or lost distinctiveness.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据