4.7 Article

Optimal power source sizing of fuel cell hybrid vehicles based on Pontryagin's minimum principle

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 40, 期 26, 页码 8454-8464

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.112

关键词

Power source sizing; PMP optimal control; Battery lifetime; Battery current constraint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen fuel consumption, battery lifetime, and battery energy loss are important performance indicators for fuel cell hybrid vehicles (FCHVs). Prior research into FCHV power source sizing has focused on minimizing fuel consumption and lowering powertrain cost, but has largely neglected to address the challenge of improving battery performance (e.g., prolonging battery lifetime). This study develops a power source sizing model that applies Pontryagin's minimum principle (PMP) as the power management strategy to optimize battery lifetime while reducing battery energy loss, fuel consumption, and powertrain cost. Battery current and SOC constraints are applied as control objectives to both reduce battery energy loss and prolong battery lifetime. In addition, fuel consumption is included as a control objective to minimize the operating cost (i.e., hydrogen consumption) of FCHVs. The developed model is applied under the driving conditions outlined by EPA Federal Test Procedure 72 (FTP-72). The simulation results of battery current, battery energy loss, battery state of charge (SOC), battery lifetime, as well as fuel consumption are compared under conditions with and without the battery current constraint. Simulation results with the battery current constraint applied show the range of SOC and the battery energy loss to be 0.23% and 5.6% lower, respectively, than those without the current constraint. Additionally, battery lifetime and fuel consumption are seen to be 0.417% and 0.068% higher, respectively, when the current constraint is applied. Copyright (C) 2015, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据