4.7 Article

The effect of Fe2O3 catalyst on direct carbon fuel cell performance

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 40, 期 38, 页码 13090-13098

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.132

关键词

Direct carbon fuel cell; DC-SOFC; Solid oxide fuel cell; Catalyst; Boudouard reaction

资金

  1. WOP consortium (Stage II DCFC project)
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [4150/E-264/S/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell (DC-SOFC), solid carbonaceous fuel is supplied directly to SOFC anode. This approach offers advantages of high efficiency, system simplicity and possibility of direct conversion for a wide range of solid, carbonaceous fuels. Additional improvements in the cell performance can be achieved with the application of catalysts. Two alternative approaches have been considered to apply catalysts in a DC-SOFC configuration. In the first approach, activated carbon has been impregnated with inexpensive Fe2O3 catalyst before supplying to the anode compartment as a fuel. In the alternative approach, SOFC anode has been impregnated with Fe2O3 catalyst while the non-catalyzed activated carbon was supplied to the anode as a fuel. In both cases, the current density for a fuel cell operating at 0.7 V, more than doubled in comparison to previously reported results in a similar test setup. This result points to the reverse Boudouard reaction (C + CO2 -> 2CO) as a limiting process for the fuel cell performance. Utilization of the in-situ generated CO improved for catalyst-impregnated anode, enabling higher conversion efficiency. Moreover, the impregnation of anode with Fe2O3 consumes 17-times less catalyst than impregnation of carbon, with similar cell performance. The obtained results were compared to other DC-SOFC performance improvement approaches reported in the literature. Copyright (C) 2015, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据