4.6 Article

Relationship between VEGF and p53 expression and tumor cell proliferation in human gastrointestinal carcinomas

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-007-0270-5

关键词

EGF; p53; PCNA; gastrointestinal carcinomas; clinicopathological factors; immunohistochemistry

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and p53 play important roles in the growth of tumor. However, the relationship between the expression of VEGF and p53 and tumor cell proliferation in human gastrointestinal cancer remains unknown. In the present study, therefore, we have examined the relationship between VEGF and p53 expression and tumor cell proliferation in gastrointestinal carcinoma (GITC), as well as the association between these biomarkers and clinicopathological factors. Methods Surgical specimens from 30 patients with GITC were examined for VEGF, p53, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression by immunohistochemical staining. Results We found a predominant VEGF expression of moderate intensity in 16(54.84%) of 30 GITC cases, while p53 expression was mainly high in 13(45.16%) of 30 GITC cases. PCNA expression was high in 20(64.52%) of 30 GITC cases. Tumor size, infiltration, vascular invasion, and gastritis were significantly correlated with VEGF, p53, and PCNA expression. There was a significant correlation between VEGF and p53 expression (P = 0.0001), VEGF and PCNA expression (P = 0.00004), and between p53 expression and PCNA expression (P = 0.0016). When the VEGF and p53 expression, and PCNA expression were considered together, both VEGF and p53 expression were not significantly associated with PCNA. A significant correlation between the PCNA expression and the mitotic index (P = 0.0016) was also found. Conclusion These results demonstrate that VEGF and p53 expression are significantly correlated as independent prognostic factors with tumor cell proliferation, and might be associated with relevant events involved in gastrointestinal tumor biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据