Accuracy and repeatability of moose (Alces alces) age as estimated from dental cement layers

Optimal research and management of species with age structure often depends on estimates of age-specific population parameters, which in turn depends on reliable methods for age determination. By counting annuli in the cementum of incisor root tips from 51 known-age moose (Alces alces) between 1 and 12 years old, we examined the variation in accuracy and repeatability of age estimates provided by three research technicians with different experiences of aging moose. The most experienced technician estimated the moose age correctly in up to 90% of the cases, while the technician with no prior experience estimated age correctly in up to 73% of the cases. The medium-experienced technician achieved a lower accuracy (up to 53%), indicating that experience alone is not sufficient if the basic training or lack of routine checks against other colleagues or a known-age material are not undertaken. The percentage moose aged within +/- 1 year from correct age was significantly higher in all technicians (94-98%). After the generally high accuracy, we also found high repeatability (0.980-0.994) within technicians. We conclude that this method of age-determination provides reliable estimates that can be used by management and research to gain information about age-specific patterns in moose populations. However, to obtain estimates of high accuracy the technicians should be well trained, have gained the necessary experience, and most preferably, have access to a sample of teeth from known-age moose.