4.4 Article

Tissue expression and enzymologic characterization of human prostate specific membrane antigen and its rat and pig orthologs

期刊

PROSTATE
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 171-182

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20676

关键词

prostate specific membrane antigen; glutamate carboxypeptidase II; animal orthologs; prostate cancer; animal model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), also called glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII), is a target enzyme for diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Moreover, it is upregulated in the vasculature of most solid tumors and is therefore a potential target for the generation of novel antineoplastics. In this context, we analyze the possibility of using rat and pig as animal models for enzymologic and in vivo studies. METHODS. We prepared the recombinant extracellular part of human, rat, and pig GCPII in S2 cell media and characterized the activity and inhibition profiles of the three orthologs by radioenzymatic assay. We performed Western blot analysis of GCPII expression in human, rat, and pig tissues using the monoclonal antibody GCP-04 and confirmed these findings by activity measurements and immunchistochemistry. RESULTS. The three recombinant proteins show similar specific enzymatic activities and inhibition profiles. Tissue expression analysis revealed that most of the pig and human tissues show at least some GCPII-positivity, while the expression pattern in rat is more restricted. Moreover, tissues such as prostate and testes exhibit different GCPII expression levels among the species studied. CONCLUSIONS. The rat and pig orthologs of GCPII seem to be suitable to approximate human GCPII in enzymologic studies. However, the diffuse expression pattern of GCPII in animal and human tissues could be a caveat for the potential utilization of GCPII-targeted anticancer drugs. Furthermore, variations in GCPII tissue distribution among the species studied should be considered when using rat or pig as models for antineoplastic drug discovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据