4.7 Article

Atacicept (TACI-Ig) inhibits growth of TACIhigh primary myeloma cells in SCID-hu mice and in coculture with osteoclasts

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 406-413

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2405048

关键词

myeloma; APRIL; BAFF; TACI; gene expression; microenvironment

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA093897-05A1, R01 CA093897, P01 CA055819, CA55819, R33 CA097513, CA97513, CA-93897] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

APRIL (a proliferation-inducing Ligand) and BLyS/BAFF (B-lymphocyte stimulator/B-cell-activating factor of the TNF (tumor necrosis factor) family have been shown to be the survival factors for certain myeloma cells in vitro. BAFF binds to the TNF-related receptors such as B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), transmembrane activator and CAML interactor (TACI) and BAFFR, whereas APRIL binds to TACI and BCMA and to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) such as syndecan-1. TACI gene expression in myeloma reportedly can distinguish tumors with a signature of microenvironment dependence (TACI(high)) versus a plasmablastic signature (TACI(low)). We tested the effect of atacicept (formerly TACI-Ig, which blocks APRIL and BAFF) and BAFFR-Ig (which blocks BAFF only) on primary myeloma growth in the SCID-hu model and in coculture with osteoclasts. With only few exceptions, atacicept and to a lesser extent BAFFR-Ig, inhibited growth of TACI(high) but not TACI(low) myeloma samples in vivo and ex vivo, and the response rate was inversely correlated with TACI expression. Most TACI(high) myeloma cells were molecularly classified as being low risk with our recently described 70-gene model. APRIL and BAFF were highly expressed by osteoclasts and were upregulated in myeloma cells after coculture with osteoclasts. Our findings suggest that APRIL plays an essential role in the survival of TACI(high) bone marrow-dependent myeloma cells and TACI gene expression may be a useful predictive marker for patients who could benefit from atacicept treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据