4.5 Article

Rheumatoid Arthritis and Tuberculous Arthritis: Differentiating MRI Features

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
卷 193, 期 5, 页码 1347-1353

出版社

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.2164

关键词

arthritis; MRI; rheumatoid arthritis; tuberculosis; tuberculous arthritis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the MRI findings of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tuberculous arthritis, with emphasis on differential diagnostic features. MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR images of 63 joints in 62 patients with clinically or pathologically proven RA (36 joints in 35 patients) or tuberculous arthritis (27 joints in 27 patients) were evaluated retrospectively with regard to pattern and degree of synovial thickening, size of bone erosions, rim enhancement at bone erosions, degree of bone marrow and periarticular soft-tissue edema, and presence and number of extraarticular cystic masses. MRI findings were compared between RA and tuberculous arthritis by statistical analysis using kappa statistics, the Mann-Whitney U test, linear-by-linear association, and the chi-square test. RESULTS. Nonuniform and greater degree of synovial thickening was more frequent in RA (p < 0.01); the thicker the synovial membrane, the greater the likelihood of RA (p < 0.01). Bone erosions of tuberculous arthritis were larger (p < 0.01), and the likelihood of tuberculous arthritis increased proportionally to the increment of size of the bone erosions (p < 0.01). Rim enhancement at bone erosion was more frequent in tuberculous arthritis (p < 0.01). Extraarticular cystic masses were more frequently seen and more numerous in tuberculous arthritis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION. Uniform synovial thickening, large size of bone erosion, rim enhancement at site of bone erosion, and extraarticular cystic masses were more frequent and more numerous in tuberculous arthritis. MRI may be helpful in the differentiation between RA and tuberculous arthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据