4.5 Review

MRI Safety Update 2008: Part 2, Screening Patients for MRI

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
卷 191, 期 4, 页码 1140-1149

出版社

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1038.2

关键词

electromagnetic fields; implants; MRI environment; MR conditional; MR safe; MR unsafe; radiology department policies

资金

  1. Bayer Healthcare
  2. Bracco Diagnostics
  3. Siemens Medical Solutions
  4. Philips Healthcare
  5. GE Healthcare
  6. Toshiba Medical Systems
  7. Hitachi Medical Systems
  8. C.R. Bard
  9. Boston Scientific Corporation
  10. Abbott Laboratories
  11. Medtronic, Inc
  12. Johnson Johnson
  13. St. Jude Medical
  14. Biomet
  15. Lumasense
  16. Advanced Neuromodulation Systems
  17. Arrow International
  18. Smiths Medical
  19. Stryker Instruments
  20. Cordis
  21. DePuy
  22. Integra Neuroscience
  23. Edwards Laboratories
  24. Newmatic Medical
  25. Resonance Technology
  26. Codman
  27. Cyberonics
  28. Smith and Nephew
  29. Inrad
  30. eV3
  31. Cook, Inc.
  32. Stryker
  33. Conor Medical
  34. Advanced Bionics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. This article is the second part of a two-part series on MRI safety. In this article, part 2, the topic of screening patients for MRI procedures is addressed. CONCLUSION. To prevent incidents and accidents associated with MRI, it is necessary to regularly revisit the safety topics that directly impact patient management especially with respect to the subjects that are new, those that should be reassessed because of recent changes, topics that deserve emphasis because of controversy or confusion, and information that should be considered in light of new findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据