4.6 Article

Particle-tethered NADH for production of methanol from CO2 catalyzed by coimmobilized enzymes

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 508-514

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/bit.21584

关键词

enzymatic catalysis; photosynthesis; cofactor regeneration; bioconversion; carbon dioxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient cofactor regeneration and reuse are highly desired for many important biotransformation applications. Here we show for the first time that cofactor NAD(H) covalently attached to micro particles, which can be easily recovered and reused, effectively mediated multistep reactions catalyzed by enzymes that were also immobilized with the micro particles. Such an immobilized enzyme-cofactor catalytic system was examined for the production of methanol from CO2 with in situ cofactor regeneration. Four enzymes including formate, formaldehyde, alcohol, and glutamate dehydrogenases were coimmobilized using the same particles as that used for cofactor immobilization (enzymes and cofactor were immobilized separately). Reactions were performed by bubbling CO2 in a suspension solution of the particle-attached enzymes and cofactor. It appeared that the collision among the particles afforded sufficient interactions between the cofactor and enzymes, and thus enabled the sequential transformation Of CO2 to methanol along with cofactor regeneration. For a 30-min batch reaction, a productivity of 0.02 mu mol methanol/h/g-enzyme was achieved. That was lower than but comparable to the 0.04 mu mol methanol/h/g-enzyme observed for free enzymes and cofactor at the same reaction conditions. The immobilized system showed fairly good stabilities in reusing. Over 80% of their original productivity was retained after 11 reusing cycles, with a cumulative methanol yield based on the amount of cofactor reached 127%. That was a promising enhancement in cofactor utilization as compared to the single-batch yield of 12% observed with free enzymes and free cofactor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据