4.5 Article

Diffusion tensor imaging in idiopathic acute transverse myelitis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
卷 191, 期 2, 页码 W52-W57

出版社

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2800

关键词

acute transverse myelitis; diffusion tensor imaging; spine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. Our study was based on our hypotheses that in idiopathic acute transverse myelitis (ATM), fractional anisotropy (FA) values would be abnormal not only in the T2-hyperintense lesion but also in the surrounding normal-appearing spinal cord and that the abnormal FA values in the spinal cord could be related to clinical outcome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sagittal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed in 10 patients with idiopathic ATM (four men, six women; mean age, 45 years; age range, 20 -66 years) and 10 sex-and age-matched normal volunteers. FA measurements were made in the spinal cord at three levels: lesion, proximal normal-appearing spinal cord, and distal normal-appearing spinal cord. The grade of FA decrease (mild, less than 10% decrease [(FA normal -FA pt) x 100 /FA normal]; moderate, 10 -20%; severe, more than 20%) was related to the clinical outcome, which was determined by a neurologist using Paine's scale of normal, good, fair, or poor. RESULTS. Mean FA values in patients were significantly lower than those in normal volunteers in lesions (0.5328 vs 0.7125, p = 0.002) and distal normal-appearing spinal cord (0.6676 vs 0.7720, p = 0.0137). All three patients with a mild FA decrease or increase in distal normal-appearing spinal cord showed a normal or good outcome, but all three patients with a severe FA decrease in distal normal-appearing spinal cord showed a fair outcome, among the eight patients to whom steroid treatment was given. CONCLUSION. FA values in lesions and in distal normal-appearing spinal cord significantly decreased in patients with idiopathic ATM, and FA decrease in distal normal-appearing spinal cord might be related to clinical outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据