4.3 Article

Neuropathology of the olfactory mucosa in chronic rhinosinusitis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 110-120

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3435

关键词

Biopsy; clinical; histopathology; human; hyposmia; immunochemistry; nasal; olfaction; olfactory epithelium

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [P50 DC006760, DC006760] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH080193, MH-080194] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex heterogeneous inflammatory disease that affects the nasal cavity, but the pathological examination of the olfactory mucosa (OM) in this disease has been limited Methods: Nasal biopsy specimens were obtained from 20 control subjects and 50 CRS patients in conjunction with clinical assessments Histopathology of these nasal biopsy specimens was performed and immunohistochemistry was used to characterize nonneuronal, neuronal, and inflammatory cells in the OM These OM characteristics were then evaluated to determine the degree to which pathological features may be related to smell loss in CRS Results: Histopathological examination of control and CRS OM revealed changes in the normal pseudostralified olfactory epithelium (OF) intermixing of goblet cells, metaplasia to squamous-like cells, anti erosion of the OE Lower percentages of normal epithelium and olfactory sensory neurons were found in CRS OF compared with controls Relative to other CRS patients, those with anosmia had the greatest amount of OF erosion, the highest density of cosmophils infiltrating the OE, and exhibited the most extensive abnormalities on CT and endoscopic elimination, including being significantly more likely to exhibit nasal polypus's Conclusion: Our results suggest that OM pathology observed in nasal biopsy specimens can assist in understanding the degree of epithelial change anti sensormeural damage in CRS and the potential for olfactory loss (Am J Rhinol Allergy 24, 110-120, 2010, doi 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3435)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据