3.8 Article

Music for pain and anxiety in children undergoing medical procedures: A systematic review of Randomized controlled trials

期刊

AMBULATORY PEDIATRICS
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 117-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ambp.2007.12.005

关键词

meta-analysis; music; music therapy; pediatrics; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective.-The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the efficacy of music therapy (MT) on pain and anxiety in children undergoing clinical procedures. Methods.-We searched 16 electronic databases of published and unpublished studies, subject bibliographies, reference lists of relevant articles, and trials registries. Two reviewers independently screened 4559 citations and reviewed the full manuscript of 393 studies. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trial, children aged 1 month to 18 years were examined, music was used as an intervention, and the study measured pain or anxiety. Music therapy was considered active if a music therapist was involved and music was used as a medium for interactive communication. Passive music therapy was defined as listening to music without the involvement of a music therapist. Results.-The 19 included trials involved 1513 subjects. The methodological quality of the studies was generally poor. Overall, MT showed a significant reduction in pain and anxiety (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.55 to -0.14; 9 studies; N = 704; I-2 = 42%). When analyzed by outcome, MT significantly reduced anxiety (SMD -0.39; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.03; 5 studies; n = 284; I-2 = 52.4%) and pain (SMD -0.39; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.11; 5 studies; N 465; I-2 = 49.7%). There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions.-Music is effective in reducing anxiety and pain in children undergoing medical and dental procedures. Music can be considered an adjunctive therapy in clinical situations that produce pain or anxiety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据