4.6 Article

Lipid-Based Signaling Modulates DNA Repair Response and Survival against Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection in Host Cells and in Mice

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0069OC

关键词

Klebsiella pneumoniae infection; internalization; alveolar epithelial cells; lipid rafts; capsule polysaccharide

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [5R03 ES014690, AI101973-01, AI097532-01A1]
  2. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute [103007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Klebsiella pneumoniae causes serious infections in the urinary tract, respiratory tract, and blood. Lipid rafts, also known as membrane microdomains, have been linked to the pathogenesis of bacterial infection. However, whether lipid rafts affect K. pneumoniae internalization into host cells remains unknown. Here, we show for the first time that K. pneumoniae was internalized into lung cells by activating lipid rafts. Disrupting lipid rafts by methyl-beta-cyclodextrin inhibited pathogen internalization, impairing host defense. A deficient mutant of capsule polysaccharide (CPS) showed a higher internalization rate than a wild-type strain, indicating that CPS may inhibit bacterial entry to host cells. Furthermore, lipid rafts may affect the function of extracellular regulated kinase (ERK)-1/2, and knocking down ERK1/2 via short, interfering RNA increased apoptosis in both alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells after infection. To gain insights into bacterial pathogenesis, we evaluated the impact of lipid rafts on DNA integrity, and showed that raft aggregates also affect DNA damage and DNA repair responses (i.e., 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase [Ogg1]) through the regulation of reactive oxygen species. Importantly, cells overexpressing Ogg1 demonstrated reduced cytotoxicity during bacterial infection. Taken together, these results suggest that lipid rafts may modulate bacterial internalization, thereby affecting DNA damage and repair, which is critical to host defense against K. pneumoniae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据