4.6 Article

Lipoxin A4 Activates Alveolar Epithelial Sodium Channel, Na, K-ATPase, and Increases Alveolar Fluid Clearance

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2012-0274OC

关键词

acute lung injury; alveolar fluid clearance; alveolar type II cell; lipoxins; oleic acid

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30772088, 81070061, 30930089, 81, 270, 132]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-Level Innovative Health Talents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Edema fluid resorption is critical for gas exchange, and both alveolar epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) and Na,K-ATPase are accredited with key roles in the resolution of pulmonary edema. Alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) was measured in in situ ventilated lungs by instilling isosmolar 5% BSA solution with Evans Blue-labeled albumin tracer (5 ml/kg) and measuring the change in Evans Blue-labeled albumin concentration over time. Treatment with lipoxin A(4) and lipoxin receptor agonist (5(S), 6(R)-7-trihydroxymethyl 17 heptanoate) significantly stimulated AFC in oleic acid (OA)-induced lung injury, with the outcome of decreased pulmonary edema. Lipoxin A4 and 5(S), 6(R)-7-trihydroxymethyl 17 heptanoate not only up-regulated the ENaC alpha and ENaC gamma subunits protein expression, but also increased Na,K-ATPase alpha 1 subunit protein expression and Na,K-ATPase activity in lung tissues. There was no significant difference of intracellular cAMP level between the lipoxin A4 treatment and OA group. However, the intracellular cGMP level was significantly decreased after lipoxin A4 treatment. The beneficial effects of lipoxin A4 were abrogated by butoxycarbonyl-Phe-Leu-Phe-Leu-Ph (lipoxin A4 receptor antagonist) in OA-induced lung injury. In primary rat alveolar type II epithelial cells stimulated with LPS, lipoxin A(4) increased ENaC alpha and ENaC gamma subunits protein expression and Na,K-ATPase activity. Lipoxin A(4) stimulated AFC through activation of alveolar epithelial ENaC and Na,K-ATPase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据