4.6 Article

Deletion of Apoptosis Signal-Regulating Kinase-1 Prevents Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury in Mice

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2011-0234OC

关键词

ventilator-induced lung injury; acute lung injury; hyperoxia; apoptosis; apoptosis signal-regulating kinase-1

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute from the National Institutes of Health [HL-081297, HL-094366]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23659033, 20229004] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both hyperoxia and mechanical ventilation can independently cause lung injury. In combination, these insults produce accelerated and severe lung injury. We recently reported that pre-exposure to hyperoxia for 12 hours, followed by ventilation with large tidal volumes, induced significant lung injury and epithelial cell apoptosis compared with either stimulus alone. We also reported that such injury and apoptosis are inhibited by antioxidant treatment. In this study, we hypothesized that apoptosis signal-regulating kinase-1 (ASK-1), a redox-sensitive, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase, plays a role in lung injury and apoptosis in this model. To determine the role of ASK-1 in lung injury, the release of inflammatory mediators and apoptosis, attributable to 12 hours of hyperoxia, were followed by large tidal volume mechanical ventilation with hyperoxia. Wild-type and ASK-1 knockout mice were subjected to hyperoxia (FIO2 = 0.9) for 12 hours before 4 hours of large tidal mechanical ventilation (tidal volume = 25 mu l/g) with hyperoxia, and were compared with nonventilated control mice. Lung injury, apoptosis, and cytokine release were measured. The deletion of ASK-1 significantly inhibited lung injury and apoptosis, but did not affect the release of inflammatory mediators, compared with the wild-type mice. ASK-1 is an important regulator of lung injury and apoptosis in this model. Further study is needed to determine the mechanism of lung injury and apoptosis by ASK-1 and its downstream mediators in the lung.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据