4.6 Article

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex 2 Loss Increases Lysophosphatidylcholine Synthesis in Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0379RC

关键词

lipidomics; mTORC1; mass spectrometry; phospholipase

资金

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH-13-1-0262]
  2. Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance
  3. Biomedical Research Institute of Brigham and Women's Hospital
  4. National Institutes of Health [RO1HL118760, RO1CA181390]
  5. National Science Foundation [DGE-1144152]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a destructive lung disease affecting women. LAM is caused by mutations in the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) genes. The TSC protein complex inhibits the mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), which is a master regulator of cellular metabolism. Using mass spectrometry-based lipid profiling, we analyzed plasma from patients with LAM and discovered elevated levels of four lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) species (C16: 0, C18: 0, C18: 1, and C20: 4) compared with those in healthy control women. To investigate whether these lipids are generated in a TSC2-dependent manner, we profiled in vitro preclinical models of TSC/LAM and found significant LPC accumulation in TSC2-deficient cells relative to TSC2-expressing control cells. These lysoglycerophospholipid changes occurred alongside changes in other phospholipid and neutral lipid species. Treatment with rapamycin or torin1 or downregulation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP), a lipogenic transcription factor, did not suppress LPC in TSC2-deficient cells. Inhibition of distinct isoforms of phospholipase A2 decreased the proliferation of TSC2-deficient cells. Collectively, these results demonstrate that TSC2-deficient cells have enhanced choline phospholipid metabolism and reveal a novel function of the TSC proteins in choline lysoglycerophospholipid metabolism, with implications for disease pathogenesis and targeted therapeutic strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据