4.7 Article

Thermo-fluidic characteristics of open cell metal foam for use as anodes in DCFCs, part II: Triple phase boundary generation of metal foam

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 40, 期 11, 页码 4241-4251

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.137

关键词

Porous metal anode; DEM-CFD; Triple phase boundary

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0019543]
  2. Human Resources Development program of Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korean Government [20144010200780]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20144010200780] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0019543, 21A20131711119] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, metal foam is used as the anode of a direct coal fuel cell (DCFC) system. A discrete element method-computational fluid dynamics (DEM-CFD) approach is used to assess the effects of the porous metal and particle diameter on the development of a triple phase boundary (TPB) between the coal, electrolyte, and anode. DEM-CFD analyses are conducted with various diameters of particles ranging from 10 to 350 mu m. It is found that the number of contacts between the particles and metal ligaments decreases with increases in the particle size; however, the contact number increases after it passes a minimum number. The minimum number of contacts appears to increase as the pore size increases. Based on these results, an operable region map is developed that demonstrates the relationship between the particle size and pore size of porous metals. Copyright (C) 2015, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据