4.6 Article

Paxillin Is Involved in the Differential Regulation of Endothelial Barrier by HGF and VEGF

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0099OC

关键词

paxillin; small GTPase; pulmonary endothelium; permeability; growth factors

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL076259, HL58064, HL075349] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circulating levels of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are increased during acute lung injury; however, combined effects of HGF and VEGF on pulmonary endothelial cell (EC) permeability remain to be elucidated. We have previously shown differential remodeling of focal adhesions (FA) caused by barrier-protective and barrier-disruptive mechanical and chemical stimuli. This study examined a role of FA protein paxillin in the pulmonary EC barrier responses induced by HGF and VEGF. VEGF increased, but HGF decreased, pulmonary EC permeability. These effects were accompanied by differential patterns of site-specific phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and paxillin and FA redistribution. HGF antagonized random FA formation caused by VEGF challenge and promoted FA accumulation at the cell periphery. HGF attenuated VEGF-induced paxillin redistribution, FA remodeling, and endothelial permeability. SiRNA-based paxillin knockdown attenuated VEGF-induced EC permeability, myosin light chain phosphorylation, and stress fiber and paracellular gap formation. Paxillin knockdown also decreased HGF-induced EC barrier enhancement and suppressed activation of Rac and its effector PAK1. Expression of paxillin-S-273 deficient on PAK1 phosphorylation site prevented HGF-induced cytoskeletal remodeling. These data show a dual role of paxillin in the HGF- and VEGF-mediated endothelial barrier regulation and suggest essential paxillin role in the modulation of Rac-Rho crosstalk. Our results also support a model of pulmonary EC barrier recovery during resolution of ALI via switch from VEGF to HGF signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据