4.6 Article

Inducible nitric oxide synthase does not mediate brain damage after transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600550

关键词

bone marrow transplantation; gene expression; inflammation; iNOS; knockout mouse; middle cerebral artery occlusion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitric oxide produced by the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is believed to participate in the pathogenic events after cerebral ischemia. In this study, we examined the expression of iNOS in the brain after transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. We detected differential expression of exons 2 and 3 of iNOS mRNA (16-fold upregulation at 24 to 72 h after middle cerebral artery occlusion, MCAO) compared with exons 6 to 8, 12 to 14, 21 to 22, and 26 to 27 (2- to 5-fold upregulation after 72 and 96 h), which would be compatible with alternative splicing. Expression levels of iNOS mRNA were too low for detection by the Northern blot analysis. Using specific antibodies, we did not detect any iNOS immunoreactivity in the mouse brain 1 to 5 days after MCAO, although we detected iNOS immunoreactivity in the lungs of mice with stroke-associated pneumonia, and in mouse and rat dura mater after lipopolysaccharide administration. In chimeric iNOS-deficient mice transplanted with wild-type bone marrow (BM) cells expressing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) or in wild-type mice transplanted with GFP(+) iNOS-deficient BM cells, no expression of iNOS was detected in GFP+ leukocytes invading the ischemic brain or in resident brain cells. Moreover, both experimental groups did not show any differences in infarct size. Analysis of three different strains of iNOS-deficient mice and wild-type controls confirmed that infarct size was independent of iNOS deletion, but strongly confounded by the genetic background of mouse strains. In conclusion, our data suggest that iNOS is not a universal mediator of brain damage after cerebral ischemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据