4.6 Article

Pulmonary exposure to particles during pregnancy causes increased neonatal asthma susceptibility

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0124OC

关键词

maternal asthma; environmental particles; titanuim dioxide; diesel exhaust particles; susceptibility

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL069760] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL69760] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maternal immune responses can promote allergy development in offspring, as shown in a model of increased susceptibility to asthma in babies of ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized and -challenged mother mice. We investigated whether inflammatory responses to air pollution particles (diesel exhaust particles, DEP) or control Inert titanium dioxide (TiO2) particles are enhanced during pregnancy and whether exposure to particles can cause increased neonatal susceptibility to asthma. Pregnant BALB/c mice (or nonpregnant controls) received particle suspensions intranasally at Day 14 of pregnancy. Lung inflammatory responses were evaluated 48 hours after exposure. Offspring of particle- or buffer-treated mothers were sensitized and aerosolized with OVA, followed by assays of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and allergic inflammation (AI). Nonpregnant females had the expected minimal response to inert TiO2. In contrast, pregnant mice showed robust and persistent acute inflammation after both TiO2 and DEP. Genomic profiling identified genes differentially expressed in pregnant lungs exposed to TiO2 center dot Neonates of mothers exposed to TiO2 (and DEP, but not PBS) developed AHR and All, indicating that pregnancy exposure to both inert TiO2 and DEP caused increased asthma susceptibility in offspring. We conclude that (1) pregnancy enhances lung inflammatory responses to otherwise relatively innocuous inert particles; and (2) exposures of nonallergic pregnant females to inert or toxic environmental air particles can cause increased allergic susceptibility in offspring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据