4.6 Article

E-ring isoprostanes stimulate a Cl- conductance in airway epithelium via prostaglandin E-2-selective prostanoid receptors

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0117OC

关键词

chloride conductance; isoprostane; oxidative stress; prostanoid receptor; secretion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isoprostanes comprise a class of membrane lipid metabolites produced during oxidative stress, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cystic fibrosis. They are widely recognized to evoke a variety of biological responses in airway and pulmonary vascular smooth muscle, lymphatics, and innervation. However, their effects on airway epithelium are largely unstudied. We examined the electrophysiological responses evoked by several different isoprostane species in bovine airway epithelium using the Ussing chamber technique. The E-ring isoprostanes 15-E-1t-IsoP and 15-E-2t-IsoP evoked a substantial increase in short-circuit current (I-SC), whereas four,different F-ring isomers were ineffective. 15-E-2t-IsoP-evoked I-SC was mimicked by the prostaglandin E-2-selective prostanoid receptor (EP)-agonist prostaglandin E-2 but not by agonists of EP1/EP3-, FP-, or TP receptors (sulprostone, fluprostenol, and U46619, respectively). This response was significantly reduced by the EP4-receptor blocker GW627386 but not by blockers o other prostanoid receptors (ICI 192,605 [TP-selective], SC19220 [EP1-selective], AH6809 [DP/EP1/EP2-selective], and AL8810 [FP-selective]). 15-E-2t-IsoP-evoked I-SC was reduced by blockers of Cl- channels (niflumic acid and 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)benzoic acid), of Na+/K+/2Cl(-) co-transport (furosemide and bumetanide), of adenylate cyclase (MDL 12,330A), or of guanylate cyclase (1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one) but not by blockers of Na+ conductances (amiloride). We conclude that 15-E-2t-IsoP activates a transepithelial Cl- conductance in bovine airway epithelium through an EP4 receptor coupled to adenylate cyclase and soluble guanylate cyclase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据