4.7 Article

Six-Minute-Walk Test in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Death or Hospitalization

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201209-1596OC

关键词

COPD; 6MW; MCID; hospitalization; death

资金

  1. NIHR Respiratory Disease Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton
  2. Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  3. Imperial College London
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. MRC [G0901786, G0901697] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G0901697, G0901786] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Outcomes other than spirometry are required to assess nonbronchodilator therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Estimates of the minimal clinically important difference for the 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD) have been derived from narrow cohorts using nonblinded intervention. Objectives: To determine minimum clinically important difference for change in 6MWD over 1 year as a function of mortality and first hospitalization in an observational cohort of patients with COPD. Methods: Data from the ECLIPSE cohort were used (n = 2,112). Death or first hospitalization were index events; we measured change in 6MWD in the 12-month period before the event and related change in 6MWD to lung function and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (health status). Measurement and Main Results: Of subjects with change in the 6MWD data, 94 died, and 323 were hospitalized. 6MWD fell by 29.7 m (SD, 82.9 m) more among those who died than among survivors (P < 0.001). A reduction in distance of more than 30 m conferred a hazard ratio of 1.93(95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.90; P=0.001) for death. No significant difference was observed for first hospitalization. Weak relationships only were observed with change in lung function or health status. Conclusions: A reduction in the 6MWD of 30 m or more is associated with increased risk of death but not hospitalization due to exacerbation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and represents a clinically significant minimally important difference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据