4.7 Article

Identification of the Mechanism Mediating Genioglossus Muscle Suppression in REM Sleep

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201209-1654OC

关键词

sleep; upper airway; genioglossus; obstructive sleep apnea; animal models

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MT-15563]
  2. Lilly UK
  3. Canada Research Chair in Sleep and Respiratory Neurobiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Inhibition of pharyngeal motoneurons accompanies REM sleep and is a cause of hypoventilation and obstructive sleep apnea in humans. One explanation posits that the neurotransmitters glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acid are responsible for REM sleep motor inhibition. However, blockade of that mechanism at cranial motor nuclei increases motor activity in all sleep wake states, and least of all in REM sleep; arguing against it as a major mechanism of REM sleep pharyngeal motor inhibition. Objectives: To identify the mechanism of REM sleep inhibition at the hypoglossal motor pool. Methods: Genioglossus and diaphragm activities were recorded in 34 rats across sleep wake states. Microdialysis probes were implanted into the hypoglossal motor pool. Measurements and Main Results: Here we show that muscarinic receptor antagonism at the hypoglossal motor pool prevents the inhibition of genioglossus activity throughout REM sleep; likewise, with G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (G IRK) channel blockade. Importantly, the genioglossus activating effects of these interventions were largest in REM sleep and minimal or often absent in other sleep wake states. Finally, we showed that muscarinic inhibition of the genioglossus is functionally linked to GIRK channel activation. Conclusions: We identify a powerful cholinergic-GIRK channel mechanism operating at the hypoglossal motor pool that has its largest inhibitory influence in REM sleep and minimal or no effects in other sleep wake states. This mechanism is the major cause of REM sleep inhibition at a pharyngeal motor pool critical for effective breathing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据