4.4 Article

How many winners are good to have? On tournaments with sabotage

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION
卷 65, 期 3-4, 页码 682-702

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2006.03.004

关键词

relative performance evaluation; personnel economics; sabotage; experiments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

From an employer's perspective, a tournament should induce agents to exert productive activities but refrain from destructive ones. We experimentally test the predictive power of a tournament model which suggests that (within a reasonable framework) productive and destructive activities are influenced neither by the number of agents taking part in the tournament nor by the fraction of the winner prizes. Our results clearly confirm that sabotage in tournaments indeed occurs. While tournament size has virtually no effect on behavior, a balanced fraction of winner and loser prizes appears to enhance productive activities. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据