4.7 Article

Over-expression of a gibberellin 2-oxidase gene from Phaseolus coccineus L. enhances gibberellin inactivation and induces dwarfism in Solanum species

期刊

PLANT CELL REPORTS
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 463-470

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-007-0471-z

关键词

agrobacterium transformation; dwarfism; gibberellin; gibberellin 2-oxidase; Phaseolus coccineus; Solanum melanocerasum; S. nigrum

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004161, BBS/E/C/00004954, BBS/E/C/00004162] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/00004954] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004161, BBS/E/C/00004162, BBS/E/C/00004954] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gibberellins (GAs) are endogenous hormones that play a predominant role in regulating plant stature by increasing cell division and elongation in stem internodes. The product of the GA 2-oxidase gene from Phaseolus coccineus (PcGA2ox1) inactivates C-19-GAs, including the bioactive GAs GA(1) and GA(4), by 2 beta-hydroxylation, reducing the availability of these GAs in plants. The PcGA2ox1 gene was introduced into Solanum melanocerasum and S. nigrum (Solanaceae) by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation with the aim of decreasing the amounts of bioactive GA in these plants and thereby reducing their stature. The transgenic plants exhibited a range of dwarf phenotypes associated with a severe reduction in the concentrations of the biologically active GA(1) and GA(4). Flowering and fruit development were unaffected. The transgenic plants contained greater concentrations of chlorophyll b (by 88%) and total chlorophyll (11%), although chlorophyll a and carotenoid contents were reduced by 8 and 50%, respectively. This approach may provide an alternative to the application of chemical growth retardants for reducing the stature of plants, particularly ornamentals, in view of concerns over the potential environmental and health hazards of such compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据