4.7 Article

Evidence for an influence of chemokine ligand 3-like 1 (CCL3L1) gene copy number on susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 409-413

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2007.075028

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: There is increasing evidence that gene copy-number variation influences phenotypic variation. Chemokine ligand 3-like 1 (CCL3L1) is encoded by a variable copy-number gene, and binds to several pro-inflammatory cytokine receptors, including chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5). Considering lymphocyte recruitment by beta-chemokines is a feature of autoimmunity, and that the CCR5 Delta 32 variant is associated with protection to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), we hypothesised that CCL3L1 copy-number influences susceptibility to RA and type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: We measured CCL3L1 copy-number in 1136 RA cases from New Zealand (NZ) and the UK, 252 NZ T1D cases and a total of 1470 controls. All subjects were ancestrally Caucasian. Results: A copy-number higher than 2 (the most common copy number) was a risk factor for RA in the NZ cohort (odds ratio (OR) 1.34, 95% CI 1.08-1.66, p=0.009) but not the smaller UK RA cohort (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.75-1.60, p=0.643). There was evidence for association in the T1D cohort (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.98-2.20, p=0.064) and in the combined RA/T1D cohort (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.00-1.54, p=0.003). Genetic interaction between CCL3L1 dosage and CCR5 genotype was found; the increased genetic risk conferred by higher CCL3L1 copy-number was ablated by a dysfunctional CCR5 (CCR5 Delta 32). Conclusions: These data suggest that increased CCL3L1 expression may enhance inflammatory responses and increase the chance of autoimmune disease. Genetic interaction data were consistent with a biologically plausible model; CCR5 Delta 32 protects against RA and T1D by blocking signalling through the CCR5 pathway, mitigating the pro-inflammatory effects of excess CCL3L1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据