4.7 Article

Multistudy Fine Mapping of Chromosome 2q Identifies XRCC5 as a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Susceptibility Gene

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200910-1586OC

关键词

emphysema; genetic linkage; metaanalysis; single nucleotide polymorphism

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health grants [HL080242, HL094635, HL075478, HL084323, P01 HL083069, U01 HL065899, P01 HL072903]
  2. Alpha-1 Foundation
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01HR76101, N01HR76102, N01HR76103, N01HR76104, N01HR76105, N01HR76106, N01HR76107, N01HR76108, N01HR76109, N01HR76110, N01HR76111, N01HR76112, N01HR76113, N01HR76114, N01HR76115, N01HR76116, N01HR76118, N01HR76119]
  4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  6. Epidemiology Research and Information Center of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Novartis
  9. Genzyme
  10. Amicus
  11. Talecris
  12. Thorax
  13. AstraZeneca
  14. Boehringer Ingelheim
  15. Merck Sharp Dohme
  16. NIH
  17. Almirall
  18. Nycomed
  19. Pfizer
  20. Chiesi
  21. Altana
  22. Actelion
  23. Lilly
  24. Able Associates
  25. Adelphi Research
  26. Almirall/Prescott
  27. APT Pharma/Britnall
  28. Aradigm
  29. Common Health
  30. Consult Complete
  31. COPDForum
  32. Data Monitor
  33. Decision Resources
  34. Defined Health
  35. Dey
  36. Dunn Group
  37. Eaton Associates
  38. Equinox
  39. Gerson
  40. Infomed
  41. KOL Connection
  42. M. Pankove
  43. MedaCorp
  44. MDRx Financial
  45. Mpex
  46. Oriel Therapeutics
  47. Otsuka
  48. Pennside Partners
  49. PharmaVentures
  50. Pharmaxis
  51. Price Waterhouse
  52. Propagate
  53. Pulmatrix
  54. Reckner Associates
  55. Recruiting Resources
  56. Roche
  57. Schlesinger Medical
  58. Scimed
  59. Sudler and Hennessey
  60. TargeGen
  61. Theravance
  62. UBS
  63. Uptake Medical
  64. Vantage Point Mgmt
  65. Creative Educational Concept
  66. France Foundation
  67. Information TV
  68. Network for Continuing Ed
  69. SOMA
  70. Biomarck
  71. Centocor
  72. Nabi
  73. RI Reynolds
  74. Institute for Science and Health
  75. Philip Morris External Research Program
  76. Hoffman LaRoche
  77. Gilead
  78. InterMune
  79. Bayer
  80. MRC [G0500306] Funding Source: UKRI
  81. Medical Research Council [G0500306] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Several family-based studies have identified genetic linkage for lung function and airflow obstruction to chromosome 2q. Objectives: We hypothesized that merging results of high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mapping in four separate populations would lead to the identification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) susceptibility genes on chromosome 2q. Methods: Within the chromosome 2q linkage region, 2,843 SNPs were genotyped in 806 COPD cases and 779 control subjects from Norway, and 2,484 SNPs were genotyped in 309 patients with severe COPD from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial and 330 community control subjects. Significant associations from the combined results across the two case-control studies were followed up in 1,839 individuals from 603 families from the International COPD Genetics Network (ICGN) and in 949 individuals from 127 families in the Boston Early-Onset COPD Study. Measurements and Main Results: Merging the results of the two case-control analyses, 14 of the 790 overlapping SNPs had a combined P < 0.01. Two of these 14 SNPs were consistently associated with COPD in the ICGN families. The association with one SNP, located in the gene XRCC5, was replicated in the Boston Early-Onset COPD Study, with a combined P = 2.51 x 10(-5) across the four studies, which remains significant when adjusted for multiple testing (P = 0.02). Genotype imputation confirmed the association with SNPs in XRCC5. Conclusions: By combining data from COPD genetic association studies conducted in four independent patient samples, we have identified XRCC5, an ATP-dependent DNA helicase, as a potential COPD susceptibility gene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据