4.7 Article

Days of Delirium Are Associated with 1-Year Mortality in an Older Intensive Care Unit Population

期刊

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200904-0537OC

关键词

delirium; aging; mortality; intensive care

资金

  1. Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center at Yale University School of Medicine [P30AG021342]
  2. T. Franklin Williams Geriatric Development Initiative through The CHEST Foundation
  3. ASP
  4. Hartford Foundation
  5. National Institute on Aging [K23AG23023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Delirium is a frequent occurrence in older intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but the importance of the duration of delirium in contributing to adverse long-term outcomes is unclear. Objectives: To examine the association of the number of days of ICU delirium with mortality in an older patient population. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study in a 14-bed ICU in an urban acute care hospital. The patient population comprised 304 consecutive admissions 60 years of age and older. Measurements and Main Results: The main outcome was 1-year mortality after ICU admission. Patients were assessed daily for delirium with the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and a validated chart review method. The median duration of ICU delirium was 3 days (range,, 1-46 d). During the follow-up period, 153 (50%) patients died. After adjusting for relevant covariates, including age, severity of illness, comorbid conditions, psychoactive medication use, and baseline cognitive and functional status, the number of days of ICU delirium was significantly associated with time to death within 1 year post-ICU admission (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.18). Conclusions: Number of days of ICU delirium was associated with higher 1-year mortality after adjustment for relevant covariates in an older ICU population. Investigations should be undertaken to reduce the number of days of ICU delirium and to study the impact of this reduction on important health outcomes, including mortality and functional and cognitive status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据