4.7 Article

Antiviral Activity of Nrf2 in a Murine Model of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200804-535OC

关键词

airway; oxidative stress; antioxidant response element; inflammation; sulforaphane

资金

  1. Intramural Research program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  2. National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most frequent cause of significant lower respiratory illness in infants and young children, but its pathogenesis is not fully understood. The transcription factor Nrf2 protects lungs from oxidative injury and inflammation via antioxidant response element (ARE)-mediated gene induction. Objectives: The current study was designed to determine the role of Nrf2-mediated cytoprotective mechanisms in murine airway RSV disease. Methods: Nrf2-deficient (Nrf 2(-/-)) and wild-type (Nrf 2(+/+)) mice were intranasally instilled with RSV or vehicle. In a separate study, Nrf 2(+/+) and Nrf2(-/-) mice were treated orally with sulforaphane (an Nrf 2-ARE inducer) or phosphate-buffered saline before RSV infection. Measurements and Main Results: RSV-induced bronchopulmonary inflammation, epithelial injury, and mucus cell metaplasia as well as nasal epithelial injury were significantly greater in Nrf2(-/-) mice than in Nrf2(+/+) mice. Compared with Nrf2(+/+) mice, significantly attenuated viral clearance and IFN-gamma, body weight loss, heightened protein/lipid oxidation, and AP-1/NF-kappa B activity along with suppressed antioxidant induction was found in Nrf2(-/-) mice in response to RSV. Sulforaphane pretreatment significantly limited lung RSV replication and virus-induced inflammation in Nrf2(+/+) but not in Nrf2(-/-) mice. Conclusions: The results of this study support an association of oxidant stress with RSV pathogenesis and a key role for the Nrf 2-ARE pathway in host defense against RSV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据