4.7 Article

Gas Transfer and Pulmonary Blood Flow at Rest and during Exercise in Adults 21 Years after Preterm Birth

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200809-1523OC

关键词

exercise capacity; transfer factor; prematurity

资金

  1. Sobell Foundation, UK
  2. Medical Research Council [G0400503B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: After preterm birth, limited data exist in adulthood regarding alveolar-capillary growth and exercise capacity. Gas transfer at rest through exercise is a noninvasive measure of alveolar-capillary development. Objectives: To determine exercise capacity and gas transfer at rest and during exercise in ex-preterm adults. Methods: Ex-preterm subjects (n = 60; median gestation, 31.5 wk) recruited at birth underwent exercise testing at 21 years of age and were contemporaneously compared with 50 healthy control subjects. Measurements and Main Results: Subjects exercised on a cycle ergometer, and measurements of heart rate (HR), FRC, effective pulmonary blood flow ((Q) over dotpeff), stroke volume (SV), DLCO, (V)over soto(2), arteriovenous oxygen difference (AVO), transit time (TT), respiratory rate (Rf), (V) over dotCO(2), (V) over dotE, VT, and respiratory quotient (RQ) were made using a respiratory mass spectrometer. In the index study group and control subjects, the median DLCO (mmol/min/kPa/m(2)) at rest was 4.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.18-4.62) and 4.75 (95% CI, 4.50-5.10), respectively (P = 0.01), and the median (Q) over dotpeff (L/min/m(2)) at rest was 3.26 (95% CI, 3.16-3.49) and 3.59 (95% CI, 3.43-3.81), respectively (P = 0.04). (Q) over dotpeff and DLCO values normalized during exercise but were reduced and lower than controls after a recovery period. No significant differences were found in exercise capacity between the groups. Conclusions: The data suggest a long-term effect of premature delivery on resting cardiac output and gas transfer, not due to abnormal cardiac or pulmonary function and with no evidence of exercise limitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据