4.4 Article

Co-ingestion of leucine with protein does not further augment post-exercise muscle protein synthesis rates in elderly men

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 571-580

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507812013

关键词

protein metabolism; sarcopaenia; muscle; ageing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leucine has been suggested to have the potential to modulate muscle protein metabolism by increasing muscle protein synthesis. The objective of this Study was to investigate the surplus value of the co-ingestion of free leucine with protein hydrolysate and carbohydrate following physical activity in elderly men. Eight elderly men (mean age 73 +/- 1 years) were randomly assigned to two cross-over treatments consuming either carbohydrate and protein hydrolysate (CHO + PRO) or carbohydrate, protein hydrolysate with additional leucine (CHO + PRO + leu) after performing 30 ruin of standardized physical activity. Primed, continuous infusions with L-[ring- C-13(6)]phenylalanine and L-[ring- H-2(2)]tyrosine were applied, and blood and muscle samples were collected to assess whole-body protein turnover as well as protein fractional synthetic rate in the vastus lateralis muscle over a 6 h period. Whole-body protein breakdown and synthesis rates were not different between treatments. Phenylalanine oxidation rates were significantly lower in the CHO + PRO + leu v. CHO + PRO treatment. As a result, whole-body protein balance was significantly greater in the CHO + PRO + leu compared to the CHO + PRO treatment (23.8 (SEM 0.3) v. 23.2 (SEM 0.3) mu mol/kg per h, respectively; P < 0.05). Mixed muscle fractional synthetic rate averaged 0.081 (SEM 0.003) and 0.082 (SEM 0-006) %/h in the CHO + PRO + leu and CHO + PRO treatment, respectively (NS). Co-ingestion of leucine with carbohydrate and protein following physical activity does not further elevate muscle protein fractional synthetic rate in elderly men when ample protein is ingested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据