4.7 Article

Triiodo-L-thyronine rapidly stimulates alveolar fluid clearance in normal and hyperoxia-injured lungs

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200709-1429OC

关键词

alveolar fluid clearance; acute respiratory distress syndrome; alveolar Na,K-ATPase; type 2 cell; thyroid hormone

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [U56 AI057164]
  2. University of Minnesota Academic Health Center
  3. Will Rogers Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Edema fluid resorption is critical for gas exchange and requires active epithelial ion transport by Na,K-ATPase and other ion transport proteins. Objectives: In this study, we sought to determine if alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) is stimulated by 3,3',5 triiodo-L-thyronine (T-3). Methods: AFC was measured in in situ ventilated lungs and ex vivo isolated lungs by instilling isosmolar 5% bovine serum albumin solution with fluorescein-labeled albumin tracer and measuring the change in fluorescein isothiocyanate-albumin concentration over time. Measurements and Main Results: Systemic treatment with intraperitoneal injections of T-3 for 3 consecutive days increased AFC by 52.7% compared with phosphate-buffered saline-injected control rats. Membranes prepared from alveolar epithelial cells from T-3-treated rats had higher Na,K-ATPase hydrolytic activity. T-3 (10(-6) M), but not reverse T-3 (3,3',5' triiodo-L-thyronine), applied to the alveolar space increased AFC by 31.8% within 1.5 hours. A 61.5% increase in AFC also occurred by airspace instillation of T3 in ex vivo isolated lungs, suggesting a direct effect of T-3 on the alveolar epithelium. Exposure of rats to an oxygen concentration of greater than 95% for 60 hours increased wet-to-dry lung weights and decreased AFC, whereas the expression of thyroid receptor was not markedly changed. Airspace T-3 rapidly restored the AFC in rat lungs with hyperoxia-induced lung injury. Conclusions: Airspace T-3 rapidly stimulates AFC by direct effects on the alveolar epithelium in rat lungs with and without lung injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据