4.3 Article

Cumulus cells accelerate aging of mouse oocytes by secreting a soluble factor(s)

期刊

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 521-528

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20779

关键词

aging; oocyte; cumulus cells; soluble factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Control of oocyte aging in vitro is important for both human-assisted reproduction and animal embryo technologies because fertilization or artificial activation of aged oocytes results in abnormal development. Interactions between somatic and germ cells are also an important issue in current biological research. The role of cumulus cells (CCs) in maturation, ovulation, and fertilization of oocytes has been extensively studied, yet little is known about their role in oocyte aging. Although our previous study has shown that CCs accelerate the aging progression of mouse oocytes, the mechanism by which CCs accelerate oocyte aging is unknown. In this study, cumulus-denuded mouse oocytes (DOs) were co-cultured with cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) or CC monolayer or cultured in medium conditioned with these cells and changes in the susceptibility to activating stimuli and in MPF activity of oocytes were evaluated after different aging treatments. The results showed that culture with or in medium conditioned with COCs or CC monolayer promoted activation of DOs, indicating that a soluble factor is responsible for the aging-promoting effect. The in vivo and in vitro-matured DOs did not differ in responsiveness to the aging-promoting factor (APF). Heat shock did not accelerate oocyte aging unless in the presence of CCs. The production of APF was not affected by the age or maturation system of COCs, but increased with their density and duration of culture. The results strongly suggest that CCs accelerated oocyte aging by secreting a soluble APF into the medium. Further analysis showed that the APF was heat labile but stable to freezing, it had a threshold effective concentration and can be depleted by DOs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据