4.4 Article

The Localization and Regulation of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin (PCSK) 6 in Human Ovary

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 68, 期 6, 页码 491-498

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aji.12003

关键词

Bone morphogenetic protein; human; ovary; proprotein convertase; proprotein convertase subtilisin; kexin

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24791689, 24791691] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Problem The aim of this study is to evaluate the expression and regulation of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin (PCSK) 6, which is known to be an important factor in the production of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) cytokines in human ovary. Method of study The localization of PCSK 6 protein in normal human ovaries was examined by immunohistochemistry. Human granulosa cells (GC), obtained from 34 patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization, were cultured with BMP-2, BMP-6, BMP-7, BMP-15, growth differentiation factor (GDF)-9, and activin-A with or without FSH. PCSK 6 mRNA expression level was evaluated by quantitative real-time reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results An immunohistochemistry study revealed that GC expressed PCSK 6 throughout follicular development, beginning in the primary follicle stage, while oocytes expressed PCSK 6 from the primordial follicle stage onwards. An in vitro study demonstrated that BMP-2, BMP-6, BMP-7, and BMP-15, not activin-A and GDF-9, decreased PCSK 6 gene expression in human GC. FSH induced PCSK 6 mRNA in the presence of activin-A or GDF-9. GDF-3, which is an inhibitor of BMP cytokines, also induced PCSK 6 mRNA expression. Conclusions PCSK 6, which is a critical factor to produce BMP cytokines, was suppressed with BMP stimulation in human GC, suggesting the presence of a negative feedback system in the follicular development process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据