4.4 Article

Early-Pregnancy Cytokines in Mothers to Children Developing Multiple, Persistent Islet Autoantibodies, Type 1 Diabetes, or Both Before 7 Years of Age

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 66, 期 6, 页码 495-503

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01057.x

关键词

Autoimmunity; cytokines; human; pregnancy; Th1/Th2 response

资金

  1. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD)
  2. Clinical Research in Diabetes Program
  3. Swedish Research Council [K2008-55X-15312-04-3]
  4. Swedish Diabetes Association
  5. Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  6. UMAS Funds
  7. Skane County Council of Research and Development
  8. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  9. Swedish Society of Medicine
  10. Krapperup foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Problem Increased levels of serum cytokines in early pregnancy may increase the risk of type 1 diabetes in the offspring. Method of study Early-pregnancy (between 10 and 16 gestational weeks) serum samples from non-diabetic index mothers (n = 48) of children who developed islet autoimmunity, type 1 diabetes, or both before 7 years of age were analyzed for IFN-gamma, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, CXCL8, and TNF. Control mothers (n = 93) were matched for age, sampling date, and HLA-DQ genotypes. Results IFN-gamma (P = 0.02) and IL-1 beta (P = 0.04) were elevated in the index mothers. All cytokines except IL-4 were highly correlated (P < 0.0001). IFN-gamma [OR 1.39 (1.04, 1.85), P = 0.026] and possibly IL-2 [OR 1.21 (0.99, 1.48), P = 0.057] in early pregnancy were associated with an increased risk of multiple, persistent islet autoantibodies, type 1 diabetes, or both before 7 years of age in the offspring. However, the statistical significance for IL-2 was lost in the logistic regression when adjusted for gestational length at delivery and parity. Conclusion Increased Th1 cytokine levels during early pregnancy might contribute to an increased risk of islet autoimmunity, type 1 diabetes, or both in the offspring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据