4.6 Article

The Effect of Cognitive Therapy on Structural Social Capital: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial Among Sexual Violence Survivors in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 104, 期 9, 页码 1680-1686

出版社

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301981

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Agency for International Development Victims of Torture Fund
  2. World Bank
  3. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
  4. US Agency for International Development Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo
  5. Open Square Foundation
  6. European Community Humanitarian Office
  7. National Institute of Mental Health T32 in Psychiatric Epidemiology [T32MH014592-35]
  8. National Institutes of Health Fogarty Center Global Health Fellows Program [1R25TW009340-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. We evaluated changes in social capital following group-based cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for female survivors of sexual violence. Methods. We compared CPT with individual support in a cluster-randomized trial in villages in South Kivu province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Local psychosocial assistants delivered the interventions from April through July 2011. We evaluated differences between CPT and individual support conditions for structural social capital (i.e., time spent with nonkin social network, group membership and participation, and the size of financial and instrumental support networks) and emotional support seeking. We analyzed intervention effects with longitudinal random effects models. Results. We obtained small to medium effect size differences for 2 study outcomes. Women in the CPT villages increased group membership and participation at 6-month follow-up and emotional support seeking after the intervention compared with women in the individual support villages. Conclusions. Results support the efficacy of group CPT to increase dimensions of social capital among survivors of sexual violence in a low-income conflict-affected context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据