4.6 Article

Sexual Timetables for Oral-Genital, Vaginal, and Anal Intercourse: Sociodemographic Comparisons in a Nationally Representative Sample of Adolescents

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 102, 期 6, 页码 1221-1228

出版社

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300394

关键词

-

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01-HD57046, P01-HD31921]
  2. Carolina Population Center (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) [5 R24 HD050924]
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. We documented the prevalence and relative timing of oral-genital, vaginal, and anal intercourse during adolescence and examined whether these timetables varied by sociodemographic factors. Methods. We used data from almost 14000 Wave IV respondents to the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health to generate prevalence estimates for adolescents who reached age 18 years by 2001 and logistic and ordinary least squares regression to examine sociodemographic correlates of sexual patterns. Results. One in 5 adolescents did not engage in any of these sexual behaviors by age 18 years. More than two thirds reported vaginal or oral-genital sexual activity, but only about half experienced both. One in 10 reported anal intercourse experience. A third initiated 2 or more behaviors within a 1-year period. In longer timetables, vaginal intercourse was more often initiated first. Most sociodemographic characteristics examined were uniquely associated with prevalence and sexual timing. Conclusions. Diversity in patterns of sexual initiation occurring in the 1990s underscores the ongoing need for comprehensive and nuanced examinations of adolescent sexual trajectories and their implications for sexual health in more recent cohorts. (Am J Public Health. 2012;102:1221-1228. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300394)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据